2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating effects of deforestation, hunting, and El Niño events on a threatened lemur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As in a related study (Dunham et al, 2008), fecundity of P. edwardsi was found to be lower when the second 6 months of life coincided with the warmer phases of ENSO (Spearman's P 5 0.55, df 5 19, P 5 0.01); in other words, during El Niñ o years fecundity was significantly lower than non-El Niñ o years (GLM, F 1, 16 5 5.5, Po0.02) (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Overall Fecunditysupporting
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As in a related study (Dunham et al, 2008), fecundity of P. edwardsi was found to be lower when the second 6 months of life coincided with the warmer phases of ENSO (Spearman's P 5 0.55, df 5 19, P 5 0.01); in other words, during El Niñ o years fecundity was significantly lower than non-El Niñ o years (GLM, F 1, 16 5 5.5, Po0.02) (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Overall Fecunditysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In cases where sex was unknown, parameters were estimated under the assumption of equivalent mortality levels among sexes and a 1 : 1 sex ratio at birth. Like most lemurs, P. edwardsi are sexually monomorphic in size (Dunham & Rudolf, 2009) and a previous study of the same population (Dunham et al, 2008) showed no significant difference in survival to 1 year of age when offspring of known sex were compared (Student's t-test, t 5 0.20, df 5 17, P 5 0.842). We focused on fecundity because population growth rate of this species has been shown to be sensitive to changes in this parameter (Dunham et al, 2008) and it may be the most sensitive parameter to environmental change (King et al, 2005).…”
Section: Demographic Datamentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations