2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating dynamics of GRACE groundwater and its drought potential in Taihang Mountain Region, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M. Liu et al. (2022) observed a significant decrease in terrestrial water storage in the Taihang Mountains, with vegetation restoration impacting this trend and even exacerbating the water resource crisis (Xie et al., 2019; Y. Zhou et al., 2023). More importantly, field sampling studies in this region have directly revealed severe degradation and mortality of restoration species caused by water deficits (X. Liang et al., 2022), which could be a potential consequence of hydrologically unsustainable ER practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. Liu et al. (2022) observed a significant decrease in terrestrial water storage in the Taihang Mountains, with vegetation restoration impacting this trend and even exacerbating the water resource crisis (Xie et al., 2019; Y. Zhou et al., 2023). More importantly, field sampling studies in this region have directly revealed severe degradation and mortality of restoration species caused by water deficits (X. Liang et al., 2022), which could be a potential consequence of hydrologically unsustainable ER practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhanja et al (2016) combined GRACE and a LSM to estimate the GWS anomaly (GWSA) in 12 major river basins in India; the estimated results were in good agreement with most observational estimates [18]. Using GRACE and the Global Land Data Assimilation System dataset, Liu et al (2022) analyzed the changes in GWS in the Taihang Mountains in the period 2003-2016 and the dominant driving factors influencing changes [19]. Alghafli et al (2023) used GRACE and Global Land Data Assimilation System products to calculate the changes in GWS from 2010 to 2016, comparing these changes with a time series of groundwater observations to verify the effectiveness of GRACE [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, the calculated GWSA was compared to the observed groundwater level anomaly from the GBA average value perspective. We noted that the groundwater level data obtained from the water wells needed to be multiplied by specific yields to estimate the GWS [19]. Due to unreliable specific yield data, GWSA was verified by comparing the annual variation and trends of observed and calculated data.…”
Section: Verification Of Gwsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the observed and modeled variables is considered to represent the component driven by anthropogenic factors. In the study of Liu et al [62], precipitation and temperature were considered the primary climatic factors affecting variations in groundwater storage. They established a multivariable regression model using the GWSA and climate variables, specifically precipitation and temperature anomalies, to quantify the impacts of climate and human factors on groundwater storage changes.…”
Section: Quantifying the Relative Contributions Of Climate And Human ...mentioning
confidence: 99%