2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-020-00551-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Drought Impact on Postfire Recovery of Chaparral Across Southern California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The five-year average rainfall following the latter fire was also found to not be a significant driver of vegetation type change, which is in line with other studies (Storey et al, 2020, Meng et al, 2014), although see Storey et al (2021). Storey et al (2020) found climactic water deficit to be a stronger predictor of chaparral recovery compared to total precipitation and water conditions preceding fire were generally more predictive of recovery than conditions following fire. Finer temporal scale patterns of rainfall (e.g., light rainfall over a month vs. a one-day downpour, early winter vs. late winter) will also likely be important to consider in the seasons leading up to fire and the first year following fire.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The five-year average rainfall following the latter fire was also found to not be a significant driver of vegetation type change, which is in line with other studies (Storey et al, 2020, Meng et al, 2014), although see Storey et al (2021). Storey et al (2020) found climactic water deficit to be a stronger predictor of chaparral recovery compared to total precipitation and water conditions preceding fire were generally more predictive of recovery than conditions following fire. Finer temporal scale patterns of rainfall (e.g., light rainfall over a month vs. a one-day downpour, early winter vs. late winter) will also likely be important to consider in the seasons leading up to fire and the first year following fire.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The five-year average rainfall following the latter fire was also found to not be a significant driver of vegetation type change, which is in line with other studies (Storey et al, 2020, Meng et al, 2014, although see Storey et al (2021). Storey et al (2020) found climactic water deficit to be a stronger predictor of chaparral recovery compared to total precipitation and . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license available under a was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drought following fire can lead to increased shrub mortality during post‐fire recovery (Figure 3B; Pratt et al, 2014; Pausas et al, 2016). Drought before a fire reduces reproductive output and seed banks, and plant carbohydrate stores that are needed to fuel post‐fire resprouting (Pausas et al, 2016), thus limiting recovery (Figure 3B; Enright et al, 2015; Storey et al, 2020).…”
Section: Causes Of Chaparral Vegetation‐type Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once herbs are established, feedbacks may promote their expansion and prevent shrubs from re‐establishing (Park and Jenerette, 2019). The speed and inevitability of VTC at this stage is important to understand, and abundant partially type‐converted stands (shrub cover 51–99% with exotic herbs present) appear to be stable for decades (Park et al, 2018; Storey et al, 2020). Without a sufficient seed bank, these sites will likely become type‐converted over time without active restoration.…”
Section: Causes Of Chaparral Vegetation‐type Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%