2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50325.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Driving Performance of Cognitively Impaired and Healthy Older Adults: A Pilot Study Comparing On‐Road Testing and Driving Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Behavior in the VE correlated moderately with self-reported risky driving behaviors. This finding matches results studying real and simulated driving performance among older adults (Freund et al, 2002;Lee et al, 2003) and suggests use of VE as a means to test risky driving is a valid and potentially useful alternative to self-report measures.…”
Section: Measurement Issuessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Behavior in the VE correlated moderately with self-reported risky driving behaviors. This finding matches results studying real and simulated driving performance among older adults (Freund et al, 2002;Lee et al, 2003) and suggests use of VE as a means to test risky driving is a valid and potentially useful alternative to self-report measures.…”
Section: Measurement Issuessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, committing hazardous or lethal errors on the driving simulator was strongly related to failing the on-road test (during which such errors would be corrected early by the copilot/tester). 70 These findings suggest that driving simulators may be a valid estimator of on-road abilities. Moreover, a recent retrospective study suggests that among older adults, performance on a PC-based driving simulator task was associated with self-reported history of accidents 71 ; it is hoped that these findings will be extended to individuals with dementia in the future.…”
Section: Driving Simulator Testingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although a sizable literature supports the validity of automobile simulators (Freund, Gravenstein, Ferris, & Shaheen, 2002;Lee, Cameron, & Lee, 2003), our simulator was designed to address specific components of driver behavior (i.e., risktaking, distraction, and decision-making processes) at relatively low cost. It presented an abstract and not-fully-immersive environment.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%