Evaluating Dominant Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Predicting Future Scenario in a Rural Region Using a Memoryless Stochastic Method

Abstract

The present study used the official Portuguese land use/land cover (LULC) maps (Carta de Uso e Ocupação do Solo, COS) from 1995, 2007, 2010, 2015, and 2018 to quantify, visualize, and predict the spatiotemporal LULC transitions in the Beja district, a rural region in the southeast of Portugal, which is experiencing marked landscape changes. Here, we computed the conventional transition matrices for in-depth statistical analysis of the LULC changes that have occurred from 1995 to 2018, providing supplementary statistics regarding the vulnerability of inter-class transitions by focusing on the dominant signals of change. We also investigated how the LULC is going to move in the future (2040) based on matrices of current states using the Discrete-Time Markov Chain (DTMC) model. The results revealed that, between 1995 and 2018, about 28% of the Beja district landscape changed. Particularly, croplands remain the predominant LULC class in more than half of the Beja district (in 2018 about 64%). However, the behavior of the inter-class transitions was significantly different between periods, and explicitly revealed that arable land, pastures, and forest were the most dynamic LULC classes. Few dominant (systematic) signals of change during the 1995–2018 period were observed, highlighting the transition of arable land to permanent crops (5%) and to pastures (2.9%), and the transition of pastures to forest (3.5%) and to arable land (2.7%). Simulation results showed that about 25% of the territory is predicted to experience major LULC changes from arable land (−3.81%), permanent crops (+2.93%), and forests (+2.60%) by 2040.

Small Cultural Forests: Landscape Role and Ecosystem Services in a Japanese Cultural Landscape

“…The study of landscape structure and arrangement is increasingly used for assessing and planning landscapes, for the quantification of landscape functions and/or of ESs [51][52][53], or to transfer the theories of landscape ecology to sustainable landscape planning and monitoring [54][55][56][57]. In addition, multitemporal analyses comparing the same landscape with the same methodology for different years allow us to measure changes over time and, therefore, to identify the integrity and vulnerability of a given landscape or of specific landscape features [58].…”

Assessment of Tuscany Landscape Structure According to the Regional Landscape Plan Partition

“…In fact, according to Plexida et al [56], there is no need to use too many landscape metrics to properly describe landscape heterogeneity and complexity; some of them, such as patch density, are suitable to describe Mediterranean landscape patterns irrespective of the scale [56], while the MPS provides data about the grain of the landscape [44]. Providing quantitative spatial data related to the different landscape structures through the measurements of appropriate landscape metrics can be extremely useful to transfer the concepts of landscape ecology to sustainable landscape planning and monitoring [42,43,57,58].…”

Sustainable Population Growth in Low-Density Areas in a New Technological Era: Prospective Thinking on How to Support Planning Policies Using Complex Spatial Models

“…These last three, have been among the most used in modelling land-use and land-cover changes. CA is defined by cell space, timestep, cell states, cell neighbourhood, and transition rules [81]; ANN are based on a machine learning system and inspired by human brain neurons structure [82]; and ABM enable the reproduction of human actions such as cognition, communication, and learning [83].…”