1999
DOI: 10.3201/eid0502.990214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Diagnosis and Treatment of Oral and Esophageal Candidiasis in Ugandan AIDS Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both articles concluded that the evidence base is generally weak and more research is required. One article that did address the efficacy of miconazole in HIV-infected patients concluded that this drug was superior to nystatin suspension for controlling oral and esophageal candidiasis [22] No systemic treatments were tested in this study.…”
Section: Oral Candidiasis In Hiv-infected Patientsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Both articles concluded that the evidence base is generally weak and more research is required. One article that did address the efficacy of miconazole in HIV-infected patients concluded that this drug was superior to nystatin suspension for controlling oral and esophageal candidiasis [22] No systemic treatments were tested in this study.…”
Section: Oral Candidiasis In Hiv-infected Patientsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Thus, even if oral and oesophageal conditions alone may not be life threatening initially, these sequelae would tend to weaken patients and make it more difficult to survive other AIDS‐related complications. Second, patients may be treated for oral recurrent candidiasis with nystatin or gentian violet paint, treatments with very low cure rates for oesophageal candidiasis (Ravera et al. 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may not be adequate for C. glabrata infections, where they recommend treatment with an echinocandin, unless azole-susceptibility has been demonstrated [12]. Empiric treatment of Candida esophagitis based on endoscopic findings is not an uncommon practice at this centre and may be seen at other centres as well [21]. This could lead to inadequate treatment of infection and could be selected for higher degrees of resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%