2016
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000001238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating data quality in trauma registries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27,32,33 Previous authors have found similar difficulties when analyzing trauma datasets. 34,35 Consequently, multiple endeavors have been proposed to overcome obstacles related to data reporting and data accessibility, especially in LMICs. 36,37 Nonetheless, nonstandardized reports generated at local and rural hospitals still account for lack of reliability in the absence of more accurate registrations at a national level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,32,33 Previous authors have found similar difficulties when analyzing trauma datasets. 34,35 Consequently, multiple endeavors have been proposed to overcome obstacles related to data reporting and data accessibility, especially in LMICs. 36,37 Nonetheless, nonstandardized reports generated at local and rural hospitals still account for lack of reliability in the absence of more accurate registrations at a national level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As trauma registries proliferate in LMICs, 8,9 there have been a growing number of studies examining the quality of data within these registries. 3,[10][11][12] As stated by Porgo, et al, problems of data quality affect the reliability of said data in inform clinical decision-making, resourceallocation planning, and any quality improvement initiative. 3 There has been widespread recognition that some existing and well-established trauma registries, such as, the International Trauma Registry in Latin America and the Caribbean regions, could benefit from integrating more rigorous data quality measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 There has been widespread recognition that some existing and well-established trauma registries, such as, the International Trauma Registry in Latin America and the Caribbean regions, could benefit from integrating more rigorous data quality measures. 10,11 It is important to note, however, that definitions of data quality vary significantly within the published literature, and methods described for evaluating such quality in trauma registries are inconsistent. 12 In the growing field of global surgery, there is no doubt that trauma is a central driver of morbidity and mortality among the young and productive members of society, across all income levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a registry, the data being collected attempt to be as minimal as possible to increase accuracy in the data collection and acceptability by staff filling the registry. There is a struggle between the need for strong data and the minimal data required to have a useful and sustainable registry 3–5 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%