1994
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1008988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Customer Satisfaction with Colonoscopy

Abstract: Twenty patients were interviewed shortly after colonoscopy, and the adjectives and phrases they used to describe the experience were formed into a 31-item questionnaire, on which each item was rated using a seven-point scale. This questionnaire was completed by 110 similar patients. Principal components analysis of these responses yielded three components: satisfaction, physical discomfort, and emotional distress. This demonstrates that patients' experience of colonoscopy is multi-dimensional; whether or not a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients undergoing colonoscopy were less satisfied than those undergoing CT colonography (median score of 61 and interquartile range [IQR] of 55-67 vs median score of 64 and IQR of 58-70, respectively; P = .008) and significantly more worried (median score of 16 [IQR,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] vs 15 [IQR, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], P = .007); they also experienced more physical discomfort (median score of 39 [IQR, 29-51] vs 35 [IQR,) and more adverse events (82 of 246 vs 28 of 122 reported feeling faint or dizzy, P = .039). However, at 3 months, they were more satisfied with how results were received (median score of 4 [IQR, [3][4] vs 3 [IQR, , P , .0005) and less likely to require follow-up colonic investigations (17 of 230 vs 37 of 107, P , .0005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Patients undergoing colonoscopy were less satisfied than those undergoing CT colonography (median score of 61 and interquartile range [IQR] of 55-67 vs median score of 64 and IQR of 58-70, respectively; P = .008) and significantly more worried (median score of 16 [IQR,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] vs 15 [IQR, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], P = .007); they also experienced more physical discomfort (median score of 39 [IQR, 29-51] vs 35 [IQR,) and more adverse events (82 of 246 vs 28 of 122 reported feeling faint or dizzy, P = .039). However, at 3 months, they were more satisfied with how results were received (median score of 4 [IQR, [3][4] vs 3 [IQR, , P , .0005) and less likely to require follow-up colonic investigations (17 of 230 vs 37 of 107, P , .0005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satisfaction, worry, and discomfort measures were derived from a previously validated and utilized acceptability measure of colonoscopy (11,13). All subscales met accepted thresholds for reliability (Cronbach a = 0.85, 0.72, 0.85, respective to satisfaction, worry, and discomfort).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A questionnaire, previously validated for patients undergoing colonoscopy (20), was administered to patients after both the PET/CT colonography and the colonoscopy (Supplemental Appendix 1; supplemental materials are available online only at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). Patients completed the questionnaires at home on the day after each test.…”
Section: Polyp Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%