2020
DOI: 10.1175/jhm-d-19-0114.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Cumulus Parameterization Schemes for the Simulation of Arabian Peninsula Winter Rainfall

Abstract: This study investigates the sensitivity of winter seasonal rainfall over the Arabian Peninsula (AP) to different convective physical parameterization schemes using a high-resolution WRF Model. Three different parameterization schemes, Kain–Fritch (KF), Betts–Miller–Janjić (BMJ), and Grell–Freitas (GF), are used in winter simulations from 2001 to 2016. Results from seasonal simulations suggest that simulated AP winter rainfall with KF is in best agreement with observed rainfall in terms of spatial distribution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein, we computed the DI using ERA and WRF reanalysis data obtained over the summer months, that is, from June to September (JJAS). We selected these months because of both their extreme heat and the significant changes in summer temperatures reported over the study region during the last few decades (e.g., Attada, Dasari, Chowdary, et al., 2018; Attada, Dasari, Kunchala, et al., 2020; Attada, Kunchala, et al., 2018). We categorized the estimated DI values based on the standard limits (Table 1), and thereafter, we explored its variability and trends over the past four decades.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, we computed the DI using ERA and WRF reanalysis data obtained over the summer months, that is, from June to September (JJAS). We selected these months because of both their extreme heat and the significant changes in summer temperatures reported over the study region during the last few decades (e.g., Attada, Dasari, Chowdary, et al., 2018; Attada, Dasari, Kunchala, et al., 2020; Attada, Kunchala, et al., 2018). We categorized the estimated DI values based on the standard limits (Table 1), and thereafter, we explored its variability and trends over the past four decades.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Komurcu et al (2018) [22], we perform convection-permitting simulations, meaning that we use convection parameterization (Kain-Fritsch (K-F) [30]) only in domains 1 and 2 and no convection parametrization is used in domain 3. Use of K-F in WRF has been evaluated and shown to yield reasonable spatial distributions as well as temperature and precipitation patterns similar to observed climatology in the AP [29]. While our highest resolution domain (see Figure 1) includes parts of several countries in the AP, our simulations and analysis are focused on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.…”
Section: Regional Climate Model Configurationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The dynamical downscaling is based on the methodology used in Komurcu et al (2018) [22]: We use bias-corrected Community Earth System Model (CESM) v1.0 projections under RCP 8.5 [24,25] as initial and boundary conditions in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) v3.6.1 [26] with three nested domains of 36, 12 and 4 km horizontal resolution ( Figure 1) with 40 vertical atmospheric levels. WRF has been extensively used for weather forecasting and atmospheric research as well as for dynamical downscaling of climate reanalyses and climate projections to study historical climate and future climate change (e.g., [22,[27][28][29]). Similar to Komurcu et al (2018) [22], we perform convection-permitting simulations, meaning that we use convection parameterization (Kain-Fritsch (K-F) [30]) only in domains 1 and 2 and no convection parametrization is used in domain 3.…”
Section: Regional Climate Model Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional Climate Models (RCMs) dynamically downscaling GCMs fields are the most popular tools to generate high resolution simulations of local atmospheric features over specific regions around the world (e.g., Giorgi and Mearns, 1999;Rinke and Dethloff, 2000;Meehl et al, 2007;Dasari et al, 2010Dasari et al, , 2014Attada et al, 2020). To constraint the RCM simulations to those of the underlying large-scale GCM features of interest, grid (Stauffer and Seaman, 1990) and spectral (Waldron et al, 1996;von Storch et al, 2000) nudging techniques have been applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%