The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1995
DOI: 10.1002/ima.1850060213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating conventional FMRI with respect to noninvasive localization of neuronal activity

Abstract: Conventional functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) allows the measurement of functional cerebral blood flow changes occurring with specific tasks using standard clinical MR systems. However, the spatial relationship between neuronal activity and functional cerebral blood flow changes is not yet known. This article reviews studies which compared the center of neuronal activation (measured by magnetoencephalography) with that of the hemodynamic response (measured by FMRI) using motor and visual stimulatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the results indicate overadditive effects with multimethod approaches. In recent papers concerning combined MEG-FMRI approaches, several authors (Belliveau et al, 1993;NBattSinen et al, 1994Beisteiner et al, 1995b have pointed out that FMRI may help MEG to constrain the inverse problem. As we show, with certain paradigms MEG may also help FMRI to improve data analysis strategies and thus brain mapping validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the results indicate overadditive effects with multimethod approaches. In recent papers concerning combined MEG-FMRI approaches, several authors (Belliveau et al, 1993;NBattSinen et al, 1994Beisteiner et al, 1995b have pointed out that FMRI may help MEG to constrain the inverse problem. As we show, with certain paradigms MEG may also help FMRI to improve data analysis strategies and thus brain mapping validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%