2012
DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2012.742127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Contemporary Crime Drop(s) in America, New York City, and Many Other Places

Abstract: This paper describes and evaluates some fundamental facts about the contemporary crime drop, summarizes the major explanations that have been offered for it, and assesses the validity of these explanations in light of observed trends. In contrast with much of the recent literature, we argue that the locus of the crime drop in the 1990s is not wholly consistent with the available data and that while New York City experienced substantial crime decreases, its uniqueness has been exaggerated. We suggest that it is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has since become clear that this was not an isolated Swedish phenomenon, as can now be seen from the increasing focus on declining crime rates in the international research literature (e.g. Estrada, 1999;National Research Council, 2008;Aebi & Linde, 2010;Barker, 2010;Tseloni, Mailley, Farrell, & Tilley, 2010;Baumer & Wolff, 2014). Against this backdrop, it is standing to reason to ask whether the crime drop will continue in a longer term perspective or come to a halt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It has since become clear that this was not an isolated Swedish phenomenon, as can now be seen from the increasing focus on declining crime rates in the international research literature (e.g. Estrada, 1999;National Research Council, 2008;Aebi & Linde, 2010;Barker, 2010;Tseloni, Mailley, Farrell, & Tilley, 2010;Baumer & Wolff, 2014). Against this backdrop, it is standing to reason to ask whether the crime drop will continue in a longer term perspective or come to a halt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although their results indicate that both developed and developing countries experienced a drop in crime, their study did not assess whether homicide, which is widely considered the most reliable indicator of crime in cross-national research (LaFree & Tseloni, 2006), also dropped during this time. Furthermore, the ICVS samples from developing countries are drawn from a single city within that country, which is problematic as crime trends within a particular city may not be representative of national trends (Baumer & Wolff, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Review: the 1990s Crime Declinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a period of volatility during the 1980s, rates of homicide, robbery, and motor vehicle theft 4 exhibited substantial declines beginning in the early 1990s (Baumer and Wolff 2014a). These patterns appear to hold for both Uniform Crime Report (UCR) and National Crime Victimization Survey data and exhibit little variation when disaggregated by gender and race/ethnicity (Lauritsen and Heimer 2010).…”
Section: Approaches To Understanding the Decline In Crimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baumer and Wolff (2014a) classify explanations into three categories: those that focus on 1) changes in the propensity to offend, 2) changes in the prevalence of motivated offenders or constraints on 5 potential offenders, and 3) changes in the prevalence of situations or settings (physical or social) that facilitate or impede crime. Propensity arguments focus on cohort-based conditions that may have resulted in decreases in predispositions to offend among youth and young adults during the period of the crime decline.…”
Section: Approaches To Understanding the Decline In Crimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation