2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-97822-8_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Confidence Interval of Fatigue Damage from One Single Measured Non-stationary Time-History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the switching time-history z(t) has only one stationary state (N S =1), the previous confidence interval expression converges to the solution given in [6] for the stationary case. Numerical and experimental results have confirmed the validity of the above confidence interval for both stationary and non-stationary random loadings [6,8,9].…”
Section: Confidence Intervals For the Expected Damage E[d(t)]supporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When the switching time-history z(t) has only one stationary state (N S =1), the previous confidence interval expression converges to the solution given in [6] for the stationary case. Numerical and experimental results have confirmed the validity of the above confidence interval for both stationary and non-stationary random loadings [6,8,9].…”
Section: Confidence Intervals For the Expected Damage E[d(t)]supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Note that each state needs not to appear in z(t) only once in its full length T j , but it can appear a multitude of times, each with duration shorter than T j , provided that its total time length is T j . It is irrelevant in which time order and how many times a state appear in z(t), so at the beginning of the analysis, the states are reordered so that they appear only once in their full length T j [8,9].…”
Section: Confidence Intervals For the Expected Damage E[d(t)]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations