2019
DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v8i4.19417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Computerized Adaptive Testing Efficiency in Measuring Students’ Performance in Science TIMSS

Abstract: The current standards of assessment are demanding for high level of precision with less time-consuming and personalized opportunities, thus restrict the function of Paper and Pencil Test which has dominated the assessment field for a very long time. The Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) is viewed as an alternative testing tool to Paper and Pencil Test as it has adaptive feature which enables it to meet the current standards of assessment. This research is focusing on the evaluation of students' ability in Gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing recent research, we can see many scientists who have dealt with the problem of implementing adaptive tests in the educational process. Modern researchers related to the problem of adaptive testing include Albano et al [3], Austin et al [4], Cetin-Berber, Sari and Huggins-Manley [8], Collares and Cecilio-Fernandes [10], Istiyono et al [17], Kang, Zheng and Chang [18], Kozmina, Lukyantsev and Musorina [20], Lin and Chang [24], Paap, Born and Braeken [32], Samsudin, Somchut and Ismail [37], van der Linden and Choi [25], van der Linden and Ren [26], Wang et al [44], Yasuda et al [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing recent research, we can see many scientists who have dealt with the problem of implementing adaptive tests in the educational process. Modern researchers related to the problem of adaptive testing include Albano et al [3], Austin et al [4], Cetin-Berber, Sari and Huggins-Manley [8], Collares and Cecilio-Fernandes [10], Istiyono et al [17], Kang, Zheng and Chang [18], Kozmina, Lukyantsev and Musorina [20], Lin and Chang [24], Paap, Born and Braeken [32], Samsudin, Somchut and Ismail [37], van der Linden and Choi [25], van der Linden and Ren [26], Wang et al [44], Yasuda et al [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%