2004
DOI: 10.1080/02699050310001646099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating computer-assisted memory retraining programmes for people with post-head injury amnesia

Abstract: This attempt to develop and evaluate different computer applications for memory retraining was made and the effectiveness of applying customized computer technology in memory rehabilitation was critically evaluated. Results of the present study showed that the unique customized therapeutic characteristics of computer-assisted memory retraining (e.g. self-paced practice, performance feedback, salient visual presentation and personalized training contents) are positive attributes of memory skill retraining outco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
40
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors suggested that the lack of change observed in memory functioning (as measured by the RBMT) supported the view that memory rehabilitation groups should help patients make better use of memory aids and strategies and not attempt to improve memory functions themselves (Evans & Wilson, 1992). Tam and Man (2004) also observed no significant differences on RBMT, in their memory rehabilitation study, although clinical improvements were seen postintervention. Quemada et al (2003) have also reported finding no change on RBMT scores post-treatment, in their memory rehabilitation study with patients with TBI, when functional gains were observed anecdotally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The authors suggested that the lack of change observed in memory functioning (as measured by the RBMT) supported the view that memory rehabilitation groups should help patients make better use of memory aids and strategies and not attempt to improve memory functions themselves (Evans & Wilson, 1992). Tam and Man (2004) also observed no significant differences on RBMT, in their memory rehabilitation study, although clinical improvements were seen postintervention. Quemada et al (2003) have also reported finding no change on RBMT scores post-treatment, in their memory rehabilitation study with patients with TBI, when functional gains were observed anecdotally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…During the training process, personal, customized procedures are used to reduce the duration of the direct contact between the therapist and the patient. Studies have shown that computer-aided strategies improve patient attention, memory, and execution capabilities [32, 33]. VR training also improves patient mood through audial and visual feedback that lets patients experience emotional success and minimizes patient anxiety during treatment [34].…”
Section: Virtual Reality Evaluates the Function And Improves The Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Tam and Man [31] promote factors that enhance the acceptance of therapeutic computer programs: self-paced practice, performance feedback, appealing visual presentation, personalized workout contents. Evidence on the effectiveness of computer-based memory training can be found, e.g., at [15,32].…”
Section: Shoppingmentioning
confidence: 98%