2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating competitive interactions between trees in mixed forests in the Western Carpathians: Comparison between long-term experiments and SIBYLA simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, we found a comparably low amount of variation in growth rates (33%) explained either directly or indirectly (via tree size) by competition. Similar results were observed for temperate tree species in a mixed-species primeval Abieto-Fagetum forest [ 65 ] and tropical tree species in an unmanaged old-growth forest [ 66 ]. This suggests that competition effects on tree radial growth are considerably less important in tree communities with a long continuity of population dynamics compared to frequently anthropogenic disturbed stands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In this context, we found a comparably low amount of variation in growth rates (33%) explained either directly or indirectly (via tree size) by competition. Similar results were observed for temperate tree species in a mixed-species primeval Abieto-Fagetum forest [ 65 ] and tropical tree species in an unmanaged old-growth forest [ 66 ]. This suggests that competition effects on tree radial growth are considerably less important in tree communities with a long continuity of population dynamics compared to frequently anthropogenic disturbed stands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This was supplemented with forest inventory data and TRW samples from six long‐term research plots (LTRPs) in the Western Carpathians (Bošeľa et al . ). Breast‐height diameter (dbh) and height were repeatedly (five to eight times) measured for all LTRP trees between 1995 and 2012.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the effect of soil fertility improvement and soil salinization control using different artificial measures is significantly different [8][9][10]. For instance, different artificial vegetation recovery treatments will have a varied effect on the improvement of soil properties, such as soil nutrient, microbial biomass and enzyme activity [11,12]. Therefore, the study to assess different artificial reclamation treatments in a region will help with the selection of a proper reclamation mode for abandoned farmland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%