2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-021-05991-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating cloud radiative effect from CMIP6 and two satellite datasets over the Tibetan Plateau based on CERES observation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6; Eyring et al., 2016) are representative of the state‐of‐the‐art climate models in the world. While many studies have been devoted to examining the simulated daily mean cloud properties and associated radiative effects in various regimes (e.g., Li et al., 2021; Miao et al., 2021; Smith et al., 2020; Vignesh et al., 2020; Wei et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021), none is focused on cloud diurnal cycle to our best knowledge. Given the above considerations, the present study adopted our previous approach (Chen & Wang, 2016b) which proposed using the ratio of “effective‐daytime cloud fraction” (the cloud fraction weighting averaged with solar diurnal cycle) to the conventional daily mean cloud fraction, to evaluate the CDV simulation in CMIP6 models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6; Eyring et al., 2016) are representative of the state‐of‐the‐art climate models in the world. While many studies have been devoted to examining the simulated daily mean cloud properties and associated radiative effects in various regimes (e.g., Li et al., 2021; Miao et al., 2021; Smith et al., 2020; Vignesh et al., 2020; Wei et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021), none is focused on cloud diurnal cycle to our best knowledge. Given the above considerations, the present study adopted our previous approach (Chen & Wang, 2016b) which proposed using the ratio of “effective‐daytime cloud fraction” (the cloud fraction weighting averaged with solar diurnal cycle) to the conventional daily mean cloud fraction, to evaluate the CDV simulation in CMIP6 models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two experiments provide good opportunities to investigate the underlying physical mechanisms of cloud feedback (Webb et al, 2017). However, clouds and their changes are complex and lack reliable and accurate representation (e.g., gray shading in Figure S3 in Supporting Information S1) even in the latest CMIP6 (Zelinka et al, 2020), especially on the TP (Li et al, 2021;Zhao et al, 2022aZhao et al, , 2022b. Therefore, we sought to reduce uncertainty in CMIP6 estimates of changes in CVD with warming (Brunner et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2020;Liang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Possible Changes In Cvd Induced By Warming Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…TP warming has been studied extensively with a focus on local factors that may lead to this phenomenon. Among these factors, cloud cover has emerged as a crucial determinant of the SAT over TP, particularly in the northeastern region (Duan et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2022). Therefore, changes in the cloud cover associated with the SAT_EOF1 are further investigated.…”
Section: Primary Pattern Of the Summer Eastern Tp‐sat And Its Associa...mentioning
confidence: 99%