2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating cloud microphysics from NICAM against CloudSat and CALIPSO

Abstract: [1] We describe a method to evaluate cloud microphysics simulated with a global cloud-resolving model against CloudSat and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite data. Output from the Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM) is run through a satellite-sensor simulator (Joint Simulator for Satellite Sensors), then directly compared to the radar and lidar signals from CloudSat and CALIPSO. The forward approach allows for consistency in cloud microphysica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
120
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(98 reference statements)
1
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results should be interpreted with this in mind. For a more detailed, cloud microphysics-oriented comparison, we direct the reader to Suzuki et al (2011) and Hashino et al (2013).…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results should be interpreted with this in mind. For a more detailed, cloud microphysics-oriented comparison, we direct the reader to Suzuki et al (2011) and Hashino et al (2013).…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such individual simulations are currently short (<1 year), have only a minimal number of Earth system processes included, and challenge our observational abilities, owing to the limited time and space sampling from satellites. However, they can be used to gain insights into poorly understood interactions (such as aerosolmicrophysics-cloud interactions; e.g., Hashino et al 2013). Such models are also generally nonhydrostatic and hence able to better represent organized convective processes and small-scale structures in, for example, tropical cyclones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microphysical properties of ice clouds are closely related to meteorological conditions, such as temperature, stability, turbulent kinetic energy, vertical motion, and humidity (Field 1999;Heymsfield and Miloshevich 1995;Garrett et al 2005;Ansmann et al 2009). Figure 3 shows the contoured frequency by temperature diagrams (CFED) that were introduced by Hashino et al (2013) for the r e derived from 2C-ICE product for five COT types. Ou and Liou.…”
Section: Differences In Ice Cloud Properties Over the Wp And Epmentioning
confidence: 99%