2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating climatic and soil water controls on evapotranspiration at two Amazonian rainforest sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher Tr in poplar compared to reed is ascribed to the higher Gs in poplar due to the regulating role that leaf stomata play in water loss (Huang et al 2011), as supported by the positive relationship between Gs and Tr observed here and in previous studies (Chen et al 2011). In this study, the Tr and Gs of the 3 vegetated areas did not exhibit seasonal changes similar to SWC, which is consistent with a majority of studies that have found little or no correlation between SWC and Tr (Fisher et al 2008;Wallace and McJannet 2010). However, this finding differs from the dynamics observed in Acacia mangium stands and in a tropical mixed dipterocarp forest, where Gs was higher in wet than in dry conditions (Kumagai et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher Tr in poplar compared to reed is ascribed to the higher Gs in poplar due to the regulating role that leaf stomata play in water loss (Huang et al 2011), as supported by the positive relationship between Gs and Tr observed here and in previous studies (Chen et al 2011). In this study, the Tr and Gs of the 3 vegetated areas did not exhibit seasonal changes similar to SWC, which is consistent with a majority of studies that have found little or no correlation between SWC and Tr (Fisher et al 2008;Wallace and McJannet 2010). However, this finding differs from the dynamics observed in Acacia mangium stands and in a tropical mixed dipterocarp forest, where Gs was higher in wet than in dry conditions (Kumagai et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, this finding differs from the dynamics observed in Acacia mangium stands and in a tropical mixed dipterocarp forest, where Gs was higher in wet than in dry conditions (Kumagai et al 2004). This may be due to the high soil water availability in wetlands, or to the substantial rooting depths that are necessary to provide an adequate water supply during drier periods (Fisher et al 2008). Therefore, the higher Tr and Gs in poplar compared to reed are the key physiological mechanisms underlying the reduction in soil water by poplar, consistent with our second hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The sensor output was converted to estimates of volumetric soil water content (m 3 m À3 ) using the standard calibration curve from the sensor. For the sand soil, the SWC values were corrected by the calibration equation from Fisher et al (2006b). Soil temperature and soil water content probes were inserted into the soil each time.…”
Section: Complementary Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ET ranged from 3.6 to 5.1 mm day -1 using the PM 2007 to 2009 in a tropical rainforest in Costa Rica (Cadol et al, 2012). The variation in the TNF is similar to that of other tropical forests when applying the PM model, since high temperatures and radiation create an evaporative demand in the Amazon region, which is usually 3 to 4 mm day -1 (Fisher et al, 2008).…”
Section: Comparison Of Sitesmentioning
confidence: 94%