2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39454-6_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Classifiers for Emotion Recognition Using EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of statistical and FD features significantly outperformed the best reported features including PSD features, with FD feature improving the performance when combined due to its non-linear property. SVM classifier performed better than k-NN classifier with an average higher accuracy of 9.56% for 4 classes, which agrees with findings in [23].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of statistical and FD features significantly outperformed the best reported features including PSD features, with FD feature improving the performance when combined due to its non-linear property. SVM classifier performed better than k-NN classifier with an average higher accuracy of 9.56% for 4 classes, which agrees with findings in [23].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A 5 fold cross validation was performed using Support Vector Machine (SVM) and k Nearest Neighbors (k-NN). Both classifiers have been reported to be reliable for classification of EEG emotion data [23]. In this study, classification was performed for 4 classes and 2 classes with the aim of comparing accuracy between classifiers for mental workload data from EEG.…”
Section: B Eeg Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to affective states recognition, [39] achieved an accuracy of 86.52% for distinguishing music likability. The best accuracy achieved in identifying emotional states was up to 77.78% over 5 subjects and 56.1% over 15 subjects in [40]. In another study, emotion recognition accuracy reached up to 83.33% for distinguishing 6 emotions and 100% for distinguishing fewer emotions [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it is applied for concentration degree measurement, depression diagnosis, stroke diagnosis, progressive bulbar palsy, spinal muscular atrophy, degenerative brain disease, and cranial nerve disease that have motor disturbance [5]. Additionally, EEG is passible the evaluation with reliability than the other bio-signal according to the research results emerged which a part to control the emotion exists on area of brain, hence the research to cognize the emotional state based on the EEG are consistently proceeding [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%