2018
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/gns9a
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Civic Open Data Standards

Abstract: Abstract:In many ways, a precondition to realizing the promise of open government data is the standardization of that data. Open data standards ensure interoperability, establish benchmarks in assessing whether governments achieve their goals in publishing open data, can better ensure accuracy of the data. Interoperability enables the use of off-the shelf software and can ease third party development of products that serves multiple locales. Our project aims to determine which standards for civic data are "bes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this proposal might sound radical, it is already adopted in public governing bodies and called for by digital advocacy organizations. Open standards are often seen within governments and public bodies, where efficient interdepartment communication is required (Sieber and Bloom, 2018) (Solid Project, 2022). The need for alternative data governance standards has emerged as a hot-button issue in wake of continued misuse of user data from large platforms (e.g., Cambridge Analytica Scandal, see Confessore, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this proposal might sound radical, it is already adopted in public governing bodies and called for by digital advocacy organizations. Open standards are often seen within governments and public bodies, where efficient interdepartment communication is required (Sieber and Bloom, 2018) (Solid Project, 2022). The need for alternative data governance standards has emerged as a hot-button issue in wake of continued misuse of user data from large platforms (e.g., Cambridge Analytica Scandal, see Confessore, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in the past editorial on platform culture researchers have ascertained that the same message may be interpreted differently depending on the social and cultural context (Alt, 2022b). The need for multiple standards has led to the terms "e-business stack" (Janner et al, 2008), "standard BPM stack" (Hündling & Weske, 2003) or "standards stack" (Sieber & Bloom, 2018) to denote an aligned set of standards. Such stacks may also be industry-specific (e.g., for the healthcare sector, see de Mello et al, 2022) or emerge for complex scenarios (e.g., for smart cities, see Lai et al, 2020).…”
Section: Standards and Edimentioning
confidence: 99%