2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Case-Base Maintenance algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ferrandiz and Boullé (2010) on the other hand, used ten-fold cross validation. This might bias the results as mentioned in Lupiani's recent work (Lupiani et al, 2014). But this gives us an estimation of methods' performances with respect to each other, without having to develop them.…”
Section: General Studymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ferrandiz and Boullé (2010) on the other hand, used ten-fold cross validation. This might bias the results as mentioned in Lupiani's recent work (Lupiani et al, 2014). But this gives us an estimation of methods' performances with respect to each other, without having to develop them.…”
Section: General Studymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some authors have proposed different taxonomies of CBM algorithms (Lupiani et al, 2014;Garcia et al, 2012). Garcia et al (2012) describe the different properties issued from variable selection and adapted to the PS methods, the properties specific to the prototyping selection methods and at the end the properties that can influence the results of an instance selection algorithm in combination with a given classifier.…”
Section: Prototyping Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the great success of CBR in solving problems related to knowledge reuse, there are shortcomings with regard to its learning capability, as follows: (i) it suffers from difficulties in managing new case structures with different structures of past cases [51]; (ii) system performance would degrade due to the addition of new cases to the case base, since more cases would mean that more time is needed to retrieve cases similar to an input query [45]; and (iii) more storage is required as more new cases are added [3].…”
Section: Case-based Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has raised the need for case base maintenance (CBM), the aim of which is to ensure an acceptable query execution time for the CBR system, and to facilitate future reasoning for a particular set of performance objectives [38]. There are two strategies that can be used to achieve CBM [45]. First, optimizing the software that implements the case-base, e.g., tuning the parameters of the retrieval step or changing the case structure and removing redundant or noisy cases from the case-bases.…”
Section: Case-based Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%