2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Blockchain requirements for effective digital supply chain management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seven dimensions network, governance, data processing, database, data, value transfer and platform were stacked into 3 different design decision perspectives: configural, operational and strategic. Büyüközkan et al ( 2021 ) proposed a customer-focused BT design by utilising group decision making (GDM) approach. The study was conducted in a qualitative way and generated critical factors to help in design of an effective BT enabled SC structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seven dimensions network, governance, data processing, database, data, value transfer and platform were stacked into 3 different design decision perspectives: configural, operational and strategic. Büyüközkan et al ( 2021 ) proposed a customer-focused BT design by utilising group decision making (GDM) approach. The study was conducted in a qualitative way and generated critical factors to help in design of an effective BT enabled SC structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Queiroz and Fosso Wamba (2019) utilised unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to understand BT adoption behaviour and usage of individuals. The survey identified a distinct Hartley and Sawaya (2019), Kamble et al ( , 2021, Queiroz and Fosso Wamba (2019), Van Hoek (2019, ), Bai and Sarkis (2020), Dolgui et al (2020), Epiphaniou et al (2020), Garrard and Fielke (2020), Guggenberger et al (2020), Ghode et al (2020), Hastig and Sodhi (2020), Hew et al (2020), Jabbar and Dani (2020), Jain et al (2020), Karamchandani et al (2020), Kumar et al (2020), Rashideh (2020), Wong et al (2020aWong et al ( , 2020b, Yong et al (2020), Albizri and Appelbaum (2021), Büyüközkan et al (2021), Casino et al (2021), Danese et al (2021), Diniz et al (2021), , Kamran et al (2021), Giri and Manohar (2021), Oropallo et al (2021), Queiroz et al (2021), Saurabh and Dey (2021), Tsolakis et al (2021), Tezel et al (2021), Vivaldini and de Sousa (2021), Vivaldini (2021aVivaldini ( , 2021b, Wang et al (2021aWang et al ( , 2021bWang et al ( , 2021c…”
Section: Pre-adoption Theme/perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, three different DMs are used during the case study. The number of DMs could be a limitation for this paper, yet according to the literature, the number is enough to reach an objective solution (Büyüközkan et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bibliometric analysis output and literature observations demonstrate that digital supply chains constitute an emerging research topic. Furthermore, recent studies indicate the intimate relation between digital supply chains and the data sharing concept through the utilisation of blockchain [31]- [33].…”
Section: A An Understanding Of Digital Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%