2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating benefits of low-cost household digesters for rural Andean communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…; or 5 hours per week [38] Figure 3. Schematics of biomethane production by anaerobic digestion of renewable feedstocks and pathways of the biomethane utilization.…”
Section: Applications Utilizations and Dividends Of Biomethane From Cprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; or 5 hours per week [38] Figure 3. Schematics of biomethane production by anaerobic digestion of renewable feedstocks and pathways of the biomethane utilization.…”
Section: Applications Utilizations and Dividends Of Biomethane From Cprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most organic substrates already have alternative uses: kitchen and gardening residues are fed to animals and dung from overnight shelters is used as organic fertilizer. While animal feeding should not be rivalled, AD slurry retains fertilizer properties and the use of animal dung for AD poses thus no resource competition and may provide economic benefits from crop production [13]. Cow dung is the most important animal substrate as it is available in almost all households and on average contributes almost 60% of the per capita biogas potential.…”
Section: Potential Biogas Contribution To Energy Needs and Firewood Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only few studies on AD at elevations above 2500 m a.s.l. exist in developing countries with well documented examples from the Andes: In Peru at 3300 m a.s.l., tubular digesters have operated at psychrophilic conditions in households with 3-5 members produced 0.5 Nm 3 biogas (0.1-0.2 Nm 3 per capita and day) with a methane content of over 60% from 9 to 12 kg fresh cow dung per day, which covered 40-60% of cooking fuel needs [12,13]. Of 261,000 small-scale AD installed through BSP-Nepal until 2012, less than 1% was installed in remote hilly regions and the mountain ecological belt above 2500 m a.s.l.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2017 stages is the anaerobic biodigestion (HALMEMAN et al, 2014;. It is a process decomposition of organic matter by different groups of microorganisms in the absence of free molecular oxygen which results in two main sub-products: biogas and biofertilizer (KLEINSTEUBER 2014;SILVA et al, 2013;SUÁREZ et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their use contributes to the decrease of the surface water, soil and groundwater pollution, caused by the inadequate disposal of SM and also reduces the emission of greenhouse gases, mainly the methane gas (GARFÍ et al, 2012;MANNING;HADRICH, 2015). Furthermore, it reduces the sources of proliferation of disease-causing vectors (TIETZ; SOARES; SANTOS, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%