2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2006.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating architectures for independently auditing service level agreements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some recent works on managing distributed system services have focused on different aspects of QoS auditing: such as trusted mediator versus in-service implementations [10], scalability and reusability needs of auditor [15], and system architectural considerations for auditing [16,17]. A common point in all these works (and our work too) is the need to deal with trust deficiency between the service provider and consumer, which gets exacerbated in a cloud setting.…”
Section: Related Work On Sla Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent works on managing distributed system services have focused on different aspects of QoS auditing: such as trusted mediator versus in-service implementations [10], scalability and reusability needs of auditor [15], and system architectural considerations for auditing [16,17]. A common point in all these works (and our work too) is the need to deal with trust deficiency between the service provider and consumer, which gets exacerbated in a cloud setting.…”
Section: Related Work On Sla Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that in most cases, migration overhead is acceptable but cannot be disregarded, especially in systems where service availability and responsiveness are governed by strict SLAs. In such systems, service providers and consumers agree upon a minimum service level and non-compliance to such agreement may incur penalties to providers [2].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campbell et al [5] propose the Quality of Service Architecture (QoS-A) incorporating the notion of flow, service contract and flow management through QoS properties. Barbosa et al outline in [3] different architectural configurations to enable the auditing of SLA and to evaluate their efficiencies. The WSLA framework [17] introduces a runtime architecture comprising several SLA monitoring services.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%