2010
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/47/5/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating and minimizing distributed cavity phase errors in atomic clocks

Abstract: We perform 3D finite element calculations of the fields in microwave cavities and analyze the distributed cavity phase errors of atomic clocks that they produce. The fields of cylindrical cavities are treated as an azimuthal Fourier series. Each of the lowest components produces clock errors with unique characteristics that must be assessed to establish a clock's accuracy. We describe the errors and how to evaluate them. We prove that sharp structures in the cavity do not produce large frequency errors, even a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
166
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
166
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluate this shift by applying the approach established in [52] for FO2-Cs, which is based on a theoretical model of the cavity field developed in [53] [54]. In this approach, the leading contributions from the lowest azimuthal terms m = 0, m = 1 and m = 2 of the phase distribution in the cavity are considered.…”
Section: Distributed Cavity Phase Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate this shift by applying the approach established in [52] for FO2-Cs, which is based on a theoretical model of the cavity field developed in [53] [54]. In this approach, the leading contributions from the lowest azimuthal terms m = 0, m = 1 and m = 2 of the phase distribution in the cavity are considered.…”
Section: Distributed Cavity Phase Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shifts [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. These Doppler shifts occur when the cold but moving atoms interact with a field inside the microwave cavity that has a spatial phase variation (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a, and the purity of the standing wave. Uncertainty estimates are as low as ±3×10 −16 , excepting a few cases where it is incorrectly evaluated [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Here, we present precise measurements of a primary clock's frequency and large [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations