Evaluating and Improving Cancer Screening Process Quality in a Multilevel Context: The PROSPR II Consortium Design and Research Agenda

Abstract

Background: Cancer screening is a complex process involving multiple steps and levels of influence (e.g., patient, provider, facility, health care system, community, or neighborhood). We describe the design, methods, and research agenda of the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR II) consortium. PROSPR II Research Centers (PRC), and the Coordinating Center aim to identify opportunities to improve screening processes and reduce disparities through investigation of factors affecting cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer screening in U.S. community health care settings. Methods: We collected multilevel, longitudinal cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer screening process data from clinical and administrative sources on >9 million racially and ethnically diverse individuals across 10 heterogeneous health care systems with cohorts beginning January 1, 2010. To facilitate comparisons across organ types and highlight data breadth, we calculated frequencies of multilevel characteristics and volumes of screening and diagnostic tests/procedures and abnormalities. Results: Variations in patient, provider, and facility characteristics reflected the PROSPR II health care systems and differing target populations. PRCs identified incident diagnoses of invasive cancers, in situ cancers, and precancers (invasive: 372 cervical, 24,131 colorectal, 11,205 lung; in situ: 911 colorectal, 32 lung; precancers: 13,838 cervical, 554,499 colorectal). Conclusions: PROSPR II's research agenda aims to advance: (i) conceptualization and measurement of the cancer screening process, its multilevel factors, and quality; (ii) knowledge of cancer disparities; and (iii) evaluation of the COVID-19 pandemic's initial impacts on cancer screening. We invite researchers to collaborate with PROSPR II investigators. Impact: PROSPR II is a valuable data resource for cancer screening researchers.

Surveillance Colonoscopy Findings in Older Adults With a History of Colorectal Adenomas

“…Study data were obtained from KPNC, and details of the population and screening practices have been described elsewhere. 30 The KPNC membership is demographically diverse and similar in socioeconomic characteristics to the region’s diverse census demographics, including the proportions of individuals with commercial insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid. 31 Thus, studies within this setting approximate community-based research within a demographically diverse population.…”

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening From Three U.S. Healthcare Settings

“…This retrospective study was conducted within the Multi-level Optimization of the Cervical Cancer Screening Process in Diverse Settings & Populations (METRICS) Research Center, part of the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening PRocess (PROSPR) consortium. 18 METRICS includes 3 sites: (Site A) an integrated safety-net healthcare system in the southwestern U.S., with data reported by their academic partner; (Site B) a mixed-model healthcare system providing health insurance and care in the northwestern U.S.; and (Site C) an integrated healthcare system in the northeastern U.S., including multiple affiliated primary care networks.…”

Timing of Colposcopy and Risk of Cervical Cancer

“…This was a longitudinal analysis of the METRICS (Multilevel Optimization of the Cervical Cancer Screening Process in Diverse Settings & Populations) Research Center, part of the PROSPR (Population-Based Research to Optimize the Screening Process) consortium. 13 Three health care systems contributed patient data: Kaiser Permanente Washington, a mixed-model health care system providing care and coverage in Washington state; Parkland Health, a publicly funded, integrated safety-net health care system for underinsured and uninsured residents in Dallas County, Texas, with academic oversight from the University of Texas Southwestern; and Mass General Brigham, an integrated health care delivery system in the Boston area with two academic medical centers and their affiliated primary care networks. IRBs at each site approved all study activities.…”