2011 IEEE 14th International Multitopic Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/inmic.2011.6151505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating and comparing the performance of DYMO and OLSR in MANETs and in VANETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that OLSR exhibits better performance than AODV in case of throughput, PDR and delay. S. Sagar et.al [8] evaluated DYMO and OLSR protocols in various performance metrics such as delay, overhead and packet delivery ratio. They conducted this evaluation in VANET and in MANET environment with the help of SUMO and NS-2 simulators.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that OLSR exhibits better performance than AODV in case of throughput, PDR and delay. S. Sagar et.al [8] evaluated DYMO and OLSR protocols in various performance metrics such as delay, overhead and packet delivery ratio. They conducted this evaluation in VANET and in MANET environment with the help of SUMO and NS-2 simulators.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed framework is evaluated in NS-2 to compare performance of the chosen routing protocols. [16] evaluates and compares the performance of two routing protocols, one is reactive; DYMO and other is proactive; OLSR in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks and Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks. Performance of these protocols is analyzed using three performance metrics; Packet Delivery Ratio, Normalized Routing Overhead and End-to-End Delay against varying scalabilities of nodes.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works in [9][10][11][12][13], study the most widely experimented and frequently used protocols for our study; three from reactive or on-demand class: AODV, DSR, DYMO, and three from proactive or table-driven class DSDV, FSR, OLSR. .…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%