2021
DOI: 10.1080/1068316x.2021.1880582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating and comparing profiles of burglaries developed using three statistical classification techniques: cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and latent class analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protoscript was adapted by using the existing protoscript framework described in Leclerc et al (2011) and Boxall et al (2018) and adding stages to better highlight the sequence of events evident across incidents (e.g., victim response and offender reaction to interventions). Once the protoscript was developed, further analysis was conducted to explore diversity across the sample using cluster analysis in SPSS (v. 27.0) (Fox & Escue, 2021 ). In total, 38 variables were analyzed and recorded as present or absent (1,0).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protoscript was adapted by using the existing protoscript framework described in Leclerc et al (2011) and Boxall et al (2018) and adding stages to better highlight the sequence of events evident across incidents (e.g., victim response and offender reaction to interventions). Once the protoscript was developed, further analysis was conducted to explore diversity across the sample using cluster analysis in SPSS (v. 27.0) (Fox & Escue, 2021 ). In total, 38 variables were analyzed and recorded as present or absent (1,0).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, to determine heterogeneity among missing person case characteristics, MDS was used with all dichotomous variables. The use of MDS is appropriate to identify the structure in a set of distance measures between a single set of objects or cases and have been previously used in criminological studies (e.g., Fox & Escue, 2021; García‐Barceló et al., 2020; Lehmann et al., 2013; Sea & Beauregard, 2021). Specifically, observations are assigned to specific locations in a conceptual low‐dimensional space so that the distances between points in the space match the given similarities and dissimilarities as closely as possible (Giguère, 2006; Jaworska & Chupetlovska‐Anastasova, 2009; Tsogo et al., 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, multiple goodness‐of‐fit measures are used to accurately select the best number of classes for interpretation: the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and the consistent Akaike information criterion (CAIC). By comparison, clinical methods and classification techniques such as multidimensional scaling have more subjective criteria for determining the number and nature of resultant profiles (Fox & Escue, 2021). Second, LCA allows for multiple categories in a variable, whereas related techniques such as cluster analysis can only be utilized with dichotomous variables, limiting important heterogeneity in measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, LCA allows for multiple categories in a variable, whereas related techniques such as cluster analysis can only be utilized with dichotomous variables, limiting important heterogeneity in measurement. Finally, LCA is better suited for examining samples of offenders as it does not assume that the data are normally distributed and linear, as these are common issues for data used in criminological research (Fox & Escue, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%