1997
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.65.3.476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating an intervention for homeless persons: Results of a field experiment.

Abstract: An intensive case management intervention for homeless persons was evaluated by random assignment of 202 cases (involving 213 adults and 70 children) to the intervention or a control group. Full follow-up data (4 interviews: at baseline and at 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-ups) were available on 98 cases (105 adults and 37 children). The follow-up rates for the 2 groups were not significantly different. Based on 13 repeated measures analyses, there were 3 statistically significant linear time effects (indicatin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
138
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(39 reference statements)
4
138
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems unlikely that a short-term intervention such as the shelter would be able to impact on these outcomes. More intensive support and housing interventions are likely needed to have a positive impact on these outcome areas (Toro et al, 1997;Tsemberis & Eisenberg, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems unlikely that a short-term intervention such as the shelter would be able to impact on these outcomes. More intensive support and housing interventions are likely needed to have a positive impact on these outcome areas (Toro et al, 1997;Tsemberis & Eisenberg, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, each participant's follow-up points would be indicated by the number of weeks since baseline, and time would be specified as a continuous variable in the design. This approach is akin to treating time between interviews as a covariate in a repeated measures design (e.g., Toro et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HIST was developed for use with homeless and poor adults (Toro et al, 1995;Toro et al, 1997b) and is based on the Life History Calendar, which has documented reliability and validity in a five-year longitudinal study (Freedman, Thorton, Camburn, Alwin, & Young-DeMarco, 1988). The HIST obtains a timeline of various events, including marriage, the birth of children, housing, employment, public assistance, and out-patient service use.…”
Section: Housing Income and Services Timeline (Hist)mentioning
confidence: 99%