2010
DOI: 10.3390/rs2102413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Airborne Multispectral Digital Video to Differentiate Giant Salvinia from Other Features in Northeast Texas

Abstract: Giant Salvinia (Salvinia molesta) is one of the world's most invasive aquatic weeds. We evaluated the accuracy of airborne multispectral digital video imagery for separating giant salvinia from other aquatic and terrestrial features at a study site located in northeast, Texas. The five-band multispectral digital video imagery was subjected to an unsupervised computer analysis to derive a thematic map of the infested area. User's and producer's accuracies of the giant salvinia class were 74.6% and 87.2%, respec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have also utilized leaf water content for invasive species detection [14], along with plant thermal emissivity [15,16]. However, limitations in these methods become evident when spectral signatures of the target invasive plants are difficult to distinguish from their background (e.g., [17][18][19][20][21]). To address the challenge of spectral confusion, recent studies have attempted to identify invasive species with phenology, capitalizing on the hypothesis that seasonal or annual growth patterns (hence intra-or inter-annual spectral variation) of the invasive plants differ from those of native plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have also utilized leaf water content for invasive species detection [14], along with plant thermal emissivity [15,16]. However, limitations in these methods become evident when spectral signatures of the target invasive plants are difficult to distinguish from their background (e.g., [17][18][19][20][21]). To address the challenge of spectral confusion, recent studies have attempted to identify invasive species with phenology, capitalizing on the hypothesis that seasonal or annual growth patterns (hence intra-or inter-annual spectral variation) of the invasive plants differ from those of native plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensues their aggressive and competitive behavior, prolific seed production, and seed longevity. 1,2 Invasive weeds are capable of moving from small, manageable infestation to larger areas reaching levels where control is either economically prohibitive and/or cause significant ecological damage. 3 Because of their rapid spreading potential and threat to biodiversity and ecosystem processes, invasive plant species have been a long-standing concern to natural resource managers, ecologists, and biological conservationists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, remote sensing has received considerable attention as a rapid and inexpensive method for quantifying vegetation distribution on large land areas [28,29]. A wide range of sensor systems including aerial photographs, airborne and satellite multispectral and hyperspectral sensors have been employed for separately mapping rangeland woody and grass components [2,30,31]. Successful separation of these components is usually linked to differences in reflectance properties because of phenological differences at the time the image was obtained [2,27,32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%