1994
DOI: 10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300010006x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Agricultural Nonpoint‐Source Pollution Using Integrated Geographic Information Systems and Hydrologic/Water Quality Model

Abstract: Considerable progress has been made in developing physically based, distributed parameter, hydrologic/water quality (H/WQ) models for planning and control of nonpoint‐source pollution. The widespread use of these models is often constrained by the excessive and time‐consuming input data demands and the lack of computing efficiencies necessary for iterative simulation of alternative management strategies. Recent developments in geographic information systems (GIS) provide techniques for handling large amounts o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…More complex, spatially lumped simulations of nonpoint-source pollution (e.g., Knisel 1980, Haith and Shoemaker 1987, Bicknell et al 1993) also share this limitation. In theory, spatially distributed models (see review in Tim and Jolly 1994) could represent the source-buffer transfer, but have not been applied to the issues considered in this paper (Merot and Durand 1997). Moreover, it is often difficult to parameterize, interpret, and verify complex distributed models (Beven andBinley 1992, Bloschl andSivapalan 1995).…”
Section: Water-quality Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More complex, spatially lumped simulations of nonpoint-source pollution (e.g., Knisel 1980, Haith and Shoemaker 1987, Bicknell et al 1993) also share this limitation. In theory, spatially distributed models (see review in Tim and Jolly 1994) could represent the source-buffer transfer, but have not been applied to the issues considered in this paper (Merot and Durand 1997). Moreover, it is often difficult to parameterize, interpret, and verify complex distributed models (Beven andBinley 1992, Bloschl andSivapalan 1995).…”
Section: Water-quality Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires the transfer of information between the GIS and the model. GIS and model can have no direct connection and information transfer is assumed by input-output routines added to the model (Srinivasan and Engel 1991;Tim and Jolly 1994;Flugel and Micht 1995;San and Kolm 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poiani and Bedford (1995) recently presented a cursory review of GE-based NPS pollution models emphasizing surface applications. Numerous hydrologic-water quality models of runoff and soil erosion have been used with a GIS to determine surface sources of NPS pollutants from watersheds (Pelletier, 1985;Potter et al, 1986;Oslin et al, 1988;Sivertun et al, 1988;DeRoo et al, 1989DeRoo et al, , 1992Rudra et al, 1991;Bhaskar et al, 1992;Drayton et al, 1992;Joao & Walsh, 1992;Tim et al, 1992;Walker et al, 1992;Wolfe, 1992;He et al, 1993;Heidtke & Auer, 1993;Levine et al, 1993;Mitchell et al, 1993;Warwick & Haness, 1994) agricultural areas (Hopkins & Clausen, 1985;Gilliland & Baxter-Potter, 1987;Hession & Shanholtz, 1988Panuska & Moore, 1991;Hamlett et al, 1992;Lee & White, 1992;Geleta et al, 1994;Tim & Jolly, 1994) and urban areas (Smith & Brilly, 1992;Smith, 1993;Ventura & Kim, 1993). In addition, several groundwater models have been coupled to a GIS to simulate water flow and/or NPS pol-lutants in aquifers (Kernodle & Philip, 1989;Baker & Panciera, 1990;Hinaman, 1993;Roaza et al, 1993;El-Kadi et al, 1994;Darling & Hubbard, 1994).…”
Section: Gis-based Models For Nps Pollution Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%