2009
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2008.156232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating adherence to medication in children and adolescents with HIV

Abstract: In our study, pharmacy supply was not associated with self-reported adherence. Most importantly, adherence and age were significant predictors of reaching undetectable viral loads.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although similar VL-adherence associations have been reported in the pediatric and adult literature (Khan et al, 2009; Nieuwkerk & Oort, 2005; Simoni et al, 2006; Williams et al, 2006), the data here come from one of the largest cohort studies of PHIV+ youth in the US and thus lend support to the usefulness of self-reported adherence data in general and, more specifically, the validity of youth and caregiver reports of youth adherence. Adjusting for age and caregiver relationship, we found two indicators ( recall of one or more missed ARV doses in past 7 days and the question “ When was the last time you/your child missed your medications ?”) significantly associated with VL whether caregiver and youth responses were analyzed independently or combined.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although similar VL-adherence associations have been reported in the pediatric and adult literature (Khan et al, 2009; Nieuwkerk & Oort, 2005; Simoni et al, 2006; Williams et al, 2006), the data here come from one of the largest cohort studies of PHIV+ youth in the US and thus lend support to the usefulness of self-reported adherence data in general and, more specifically, the validity of youth and caregiver reports of youth adherence. Adjusting for age and caregiver relationship, we found two indicators ( recall of one or more missed ARV doses in past 7 days and the question “ When was the last time you/your child missed your medications ?”) significantly associated with VL whether caregiver and youth responses were analyzed independently or combined.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…HIV infected adolescents face adherence challenges during their transition to adulthood like palatability issues, pill burden, interference of ART with lifestyles, adolescent HIV infected patients' growing independence, increased peer pressure, fear of stigmatization and other factors [38][39][40][41] . Pt3 was an adolescent who dropped out of school and eloped with a man, in South Africa, adolescents were less adherent to ART than adults 19 , while in the USA, adolescents (13-18 year old) were less likely to achieve undetectable viral loads than children less than 13 year old 20 , and in Haiti where HIV-infected youths and adolescents had poor ART adherence 21 . Pt4 was also an adolescent who had sexuality challenges, and the N. gonorrhoeae urethritis was proof of unprotected sexual intercourse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure to disclose HIV serostatus, poor social and family support, concurrent use of other medications with ART have also been found to be associated with poor ART adherence [14][15][16][17][18] . Adolescents have been found to be less adherent to ART than adults and younger children, while orphanhood and lack of social support have also been reported to be associated with poor ART adherence 15,[19][20][21] . Standardised approaches are often used to enhance improvement in adherence to ART, however this may not be appropriate in all cases as this paper illustrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data suggest that adolescents have poorer adherence to ART when compared with younger children 221. In adolescents commencing first‐line therapy, a boosted PI ‐based regimen potentially reduces the risk of accumulating resistance mutations in the event of virological failure; however, such regimens have a higher pill burden than the FDCs based on NNRTIs or EVG which have a lower genetic barrier to resistance.…”
Section: Adolescence Mental Health and Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%