2016
DOI: 10.1093/jssam/smw020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Active (Opt-In) and Passive (Opt-Out) Consent Bias in the Transfer of Federal Contact Data to a Third-Party Survey Agency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details of the experiment are described in Sakshaug et al . (). Before the fieldwork, a notification letter was sent to 7183 available addresses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Details of the experiment are described in Sakshaug et al . (). Before the fieldwork, a notification letter was sent to 7183 available addresses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since the primary purpose of the survey was to explore possible selectivity effects, a random subsample of 10 000 people was asked for consent to address transfer and the consenters' addresses as well as control group addresses were transferred from the German Institute for Employment Research to the survey operator. Details of the experiment are described in Sakshaug et al (2016). Before the fieldwork, a notification letter was sent to 7183 available addresses.…”
Section: Sampling and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that recruitment of participants often suffers from a bias towards higher SES families ( Fry et al, 2017 ; Henrich et al, 2010 ; Sakshaug et al, 2016 ; Wolke et al, 2009 ), particular care was taken to ensure the sample was reflective of the spread of SES in the UK. Participants were primarily recruited through schools that have over 27 % of students receiving free school meals (FSM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of Eleanor Singer’s key contributions to the survey methodological literature—and, indeed, social science literature more broadly—relates to the issue of informed consent. Her contributions in this area covered a wide range of topics, including the effect of the consent request on survey participation (e.g., Singer 1978, 2003; Singer, von Thurn, and Miller 1995; Sakshaug et al 2016), consent to paradata capture (Singer and Couper 2010; Couper and Singer 2013), and attitudes toward administrative data linkages (e.g., Singer, Bates, and van Hoewyk 2011). A core element underlying her work was that the issue of consent in whatever form is not only an ethical one but is also subject to empirical investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%