Evaluating Action Durations for Adaptive Traffic Signal Control Based On Deep Q-Learning

Çeltek, Seyit Alperen; Durdu, Akif; Ali, Muslim

doi:10.1007/s13177-021-00262-5

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In order to enhance the prediction ability of deep learning, ensemble methods are widely used in load forecasting [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The ensemble model can improve the predictive capability of the model by combining multiple predictors [26].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A novel ensemble deep reinforcement learning model for short‐term load forecasting based on Q‐learning dynamic model selection

He,

Zhao,

Zhang

et al. 2024

The Journal of Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Short‐term load forecasting is critical for power system planning and operations, and ensemble forecasting methods for electricity loads have been shown to be effective in obtaining accurate forecasts. However, the weights in ensemble prediction models are usually preset based on the overall performance after training, which prevents the model from adapting in the face of different scenarios, limiting the improvement of prediction performance. In order to improve the accurateness and validity of the ensemble prediction method further, this paper proposes an ensemble deep reinforcement learning approach using Q‐learning dynamic weight assignment to consider local behaviours caused by changes in the external environment. Firstly, the variational mode decomposition is used to reduce the non‐stationarity of the original data by decomposing the load sequence. Then, the recurrent neural network (RNN), long short‐term memory (LSTM), and gated recurrent unit (GRU) are selected as the basic power load predictors. Finally, the optimal weights are ensembled for the three sub‐predictors by the optimal weights generated using the Q‐learning algorithm, and the final results are obtained by combining their respective predictions. The results show that the forecasting capability of the proposed method outperforms all sub‐models and several baseline ensemble forecasting methods.

show abstract