2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70139-4_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Accuracy in Prudence Analysis for Cyber Security

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where p( , ) is the joint probability function of Φ and Ω, and p( ) and p( ) are the probability distribution functions of Φ and Ω, respectively. F and ACC are derivations from the confusion matrix whose structure is reflected in Table 2 [40,41]. F comprehensively considers the proportion of true positive result in…”
Section: Engineering Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p( , ) is the joint probability function of Φ and Ω, and p( ) and p( ) are the probability distribution functions of Φ and Ω, respectively. F and ACC are derivations from the confusion matrix whose structure is reflected in Table 2 [40,41]. F comprehensively considers the proportion of true positive result in…”
Section: Engineering Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PAEM refers to such expected cases which are requiring prompt to be far less common as compared to the cases which do not require prompt. For detection system based on classification, it may also be worthwhile to evaluate the proposed model not just in term of the classification accuracy which is often criticized in literature but also relative to its classifier and prudence accuracy [28]. Therefore, the PAEM is applied to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed prudence alert system.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of the Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%