1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0925(1998110)5:3<126::aid-ema86>3.0.co;2-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a technique used to measure environmental performance within agriculture-case studies

Abstract: A methodology has been developed which can be used to assess the environmental performance of a farm. The computer-based system, known as EMA, utilizes a checklist auditing process based on both quantitative and qualitative data and looks, holistically, at the farm assessing a wide range of farming activities including crop production, crop protection, resource and waste management, livestock husbandry and conservation. The system relies on the use of eco-ratings which are activity based performance indices de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This meaning departs to a certain extent from the usually accepted definition of risk as an expression of the probability of occurrence of some adverse outcome to some organism (Warren-Hicks and Moore, 1998, p. 25), although it has been widely adopted (Reus and Leendertse, 2000;Sánchez-Bayo et al, 2002). It is also important to note that consequent to the procedures used to estimate ADI/RfDs, pesticide and diet intake scores based on risk-ratios tend to span over several orders of magnitude, as contrasting with scores based on relative rankings (Lewis and Tzilivakis, 1998), combined decision rules including fuzzy parameters (van der Werf and Zimmer, 1998), or combinations of chemical properties and application practices (Brüggeman and Halfon, 1995). This has several implications.…”
Section: Pesticide Risk Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meaning departs to a certain extent from the usually accepted definition of risk as an expression of the probability of occurrence of some adverse outcome to some organism (Warren-Hicks and Moore, 1998, p. 25), although it has been widely adopted (Reus and Leendertse, 2000;Sánchez-Bayo et al, 2002). It is also important to note that consequent to the procedures used to estimate ADI/RfDs, pesticide and diet intake scores based on risk-ratios tend to span over several orders of magnitude, as contrasting with scores based on relative rankings (Lewis and Tzilivakis, 1998), combined decision rules including fuzzy parameters (van der Werf and Zimmer, 1998), or combinations of chemical properties and application practices (Brüggeman and Halfon, 1995). This has several implications.…”
Section: Pesticide Risk Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental Management for Agriculture (EMA) is the product of an on‐going research and development programme which aims to produce a unified software package to help farmers and their advisers manage the environmental impacts arising from farming practices across the whole farm. The software has been described in detail elsewhere1–3 and only a brief summary is provided here. Principally, the software package is an exercise in technology transfer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%