2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2017.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a Seed Technology for Sagebrush Restoration Across an Elevation Gradient: Support for Bet Hedging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our focus here, and therefore our inference on what drivers are critical for restoration, was simply on the establishment of any sagebrush, and not the likelihood of returning to a preburn condition. Still, these results are supported by the limited number of empirical studies that have found that repeated seeding improves restoration success in arid and semi‐arid ecosystems more than other management interventions such as competitor control or seed preparation (Davies et al., ; Wilson, Bakker, Christian, & Li, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, our focus here, and therefore our inference on what drivers are critical for restoration, was simply on the establishment of any sagebrush, and not the likelihood of returning to a preburn condition. Still, these results are supported by the limited number of empirical studies that have found that repeated seeding improves restoration success in arid and semi‐arid ecosystems more than other management interventions such as competitor control or seed preparation (Davies et al., ; Wilson, Bakker, Christian, & Li, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Still, these results are supported by the limited number of empirical studies that have found that repeated seeding improves restoration success in arid and semi-arid ecosystems more than other management interventions such as competitor control or seed preparation (Davies et al, 2018;Wilson, Bakker, Christian, & Li, 2004).…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, this suggests that seeding introduced species is not necessary to achieve management objectives after fire in mountain big sagebrush communities. This is a stark contrast to Wyoming big sagebrush communities, where seeded native vegetation often fails to establish (Eiswerth et al ; Boyd & Davies ; Davies et al ); however, there are exceptions (see Davies et al ). Mountain big sagebrush communities are cooler and wetter than Wyoming big sagebrush communities (West et al ; Winward ; Hironaka et al ) and this likely explains why seeded native vegetation often successfully establishes in these communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These studies were also limited as they only seeded sagebrush (Davies et al ; Davies & Bates ), included non‐native species (Davies et al ), or used small plot design (2 × 2 m) that did not include sagebrush (Sheley & Bates ). Seeding mountain big sagebrush is often successful (Davies et al , ; Davies & Bates ). Herbaceous vegetation, particularly non‐native species, may limit shrub establishment (Rinella et al , ; Davies et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%