2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a realistic agent in an advice-giving task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is to keep the system simple. As inconsistency between emotion and content is undesireable (Berry et al, 2005), we avoided this by the simple expedient of choosing system utterances that would be compatible with any emotional coloring.…”
Section: Dialog Manager and Speech Recognizermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is to keep the system simple. As inconsistency between emotion and content is undesireable (Berry et al, 2005), we avoided this by the simple expedient of choosing system utterances that would be compatible with any emotional coloring.…”
Section: Dialog Manager and Speech Recognizermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from previous studies indicate that the use of an ECA can have a positive effect on how the feedback is received by the user in behaviour change support systems. This can eventually lead to a better performance of the coaching program in the future and a more effective way to support users to change their behaviour (Schulman & Bickmore 2009;Blanson Henkemans et al 2009;Berry et al 2005). The results of this user evaluation and the effect of adding an ECA to the UI are subject of future user evaluations with a working prototype of the system.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An interface agent is, more generally, a computer-generated character designed to interact with users by simulating human appearance and behaviors through artificial intelligence. Dependent on their function, they are referred to as Virtual Customer Service Agent [ 15], Product Recommendation Agent [ 6], Embodied Conversational Agent [ 11], [ 17], Pedagogical Agent [ 18], [19][20][21], [31], or as a human-like or embodied agent/character [12][13], [23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%