2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00766-022-00388-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a privacy requirements specification method by using a mixed-method approach: results and lessons learned

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicates that the inclination to use tools exists but is underutilized. These computer-aided tools can range from web forms [9], [28]- [30] to modeling tools [29], [31], [32], or even use natural language processing techniques [33]- [35]. The distribution of the use of computer-aided tools is depicted in Figure 5.…”
Section: Rq14: Do the Papers Reference The Utilization Of Computer-as...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It indicates that the inclination to use tools exists but is underutilized. These computer-aided tools can range from web forms [9], [28]- [30] to modeling tools [29], [31], [32], or even use natural language processing techniques [33]- [35]. The distribution of the use of computer-aided tools is depicted in Figure 5.…”
Section: Rq14: Do the Papers Reference The Utilization Of Computer-as...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also opens up the use of natural language processing (NLP) techniques applied in textual requirements representation [16]. Requirements can be synthesized from the questionnaire [30], [46], [47], cocreation tools [45] or other methods of eliciting privacy goals from the previous steps.…”
Section: ) Elicit Functional Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations