2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a prior on relative stock status using simplified age-structured models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Key potential areas for future improvement include better informed prior distributions for final status in different regions, including priors that account for the characteristics of fishery resources in different regions (Cope et al . ), inclusion of existing survey and fishery data (Thorson et al . ), and evaluation of how well these models inform management strategies for data‐limited fisheries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Key potential areas for future improvement include better informed prior distributions for final status in different regions, including priors that account for the characteristics of fishery resources in different regions (Cope et al . ), inclusion of existing survey and fishery data (Thorson et al . ), and evaluation of how well these models inform management strategies for data‐limited fisheries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the superensemble method as applied here is trained on simulation results, and therefore may not capture other features in the dynamics of real populations including the impact of factors such as climate change. Key potential areas for future improvement include better informed prior distributions for final status in different regions, including priors that account for the characteristics of fishery resources in different regions (Cope et al 2015), inclusion of existing survey and fishery data (Thorson et al 2012), and evaluation of how well these models inform management strategies for data-limited fisheries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative ways of deriving this important stock metric would be a valuable contribution to management. Cope et al [31] developed a method that estimates a stock status prior using Productivity-Susceptibility Analysis (PSA) vulnerability scores, being the first step towards solutions for defining stock status in data-limited situations. Other possible alternatives for defining stock status, when facing data limitations, include the utilization of information from species with similar exploitation/biology [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using all available data (FULL run), the current biomass was estimated as 7% of the carrying capacity and B MSY as 32 000 tonnes (50% of K). Cope et al (2015) derived an empirical relationship between species vulnerability to fishing and depletion rate of (more or less) unmanaged stocks for the US Pacific coast. For thornback ray in the Celtic Sea, McCully et al (2015) estimated a vulnerability score of 1.61.…”
Section: Thornback Ray In the Bay Of Biscaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For thornback ray in the Celtic Sea, McCully et al (2015) estimated a vulnerability score of 1.61. For this level of vulnerability the empirical relationship of Cope et al (2015) gives a depletion rate of 0.54. If our estimates are correct, the depletion of thornback ray in the Bay of Biscay is rather severe, suggesting either vulnerability to fishing is higher than in the Celtic Sea or that unmanaged fishing pressure was much higher than on US Pacific coast, or both.…”
Section: Thornback Ray In the Bay Of Biscaymentioning
confidence: 99%