2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58323-1_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a Multi-sense Definition Generation Model for Multiple Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noraset et al (2017) report BLEU of 31 and 23, depending on the dictionary. Subsequent experiments report, for the same approach, BLEU scores that range from as little as 11 (Gadetsky et al, 2018) to as much as 60 (Kabiri and Cook, 2020). The variation can be great even for the same language and experimental setup (Kabiri and Cook, 2020).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Noraset et al (2017) report BLEU of 31 and 23, depending on the dictionary. Subsequent experiments report, for the same approach, BLEU scores that range from as little as 11 (Gadetsky et al, 2018) to as much as 60 (Kabiri and Cook, 2020). The variation can be great even for the same language and experimental setup (Kabiri and Cook, 2020).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Subsequent work on Definition Modeling focused on variations of the problem of prediction of a word gloss from the word sense. These approaches consider gloss prediction based on sensespecific word embeddings (Gadetsky et al, 2018;Kabiri and Cook, 2020;Zhu et al, 2019), and on a word-based context indicating the word sense (Bevilacqua et al, 2020;Gadetsky et al, 2018;Mickus et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2020;. The proposed approaches are based either on RNNs (Gadetsky et al, 2018;Kabiri and Cook, 2020;Zhu et al, 2019) or Transformers (Bevilacqua et al, 2020;Mickus et al, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations