2017
DOI: 10.9790/0853-1605030308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluate The Role of Tranexamic Acid In Joint Replacement Surgeries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are seen when tranexamic acid is administered rapidly 31 , however in our study we administered tranexamic acid slowly before induction of anaesthesia. The results of studies by Yadav et al 23 and Dahuja et al 20 stand in support of our results. In our study long term adverse effects of tranexamic acid (Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular episode) were not studied.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These are seen when tranexamic acid is administered rapidly 31 , however in our study we administered tranexamic acid slowly before induction of anaesthesia. The results of studies by Yadav et al 23 and Dahuja et al 20 stand in support of our results. In our study long term adverse effects of tranexamic acid (Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular episode) were not studied.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results were comparable with the study by Thipparampall et al 6 who showed that the difference between control group (C) (26.7 ± 3.04 %) and bolus group (B) (31.3 ± 4.22%) with respect to postoperative haematocrit on day 1 was statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was significant drop in the haemoglobin postoperatively in group C as compared to group T (p < 0.0001).Studies by Seijas et al, 28 Vijay et al, 11 Dhawale et al, 29 Chang et al 30 and Yadav et al 23 show results in accordance with our result (p<0.05). The difference between group C and T with respect to drop in haematocrit was statistically significant (p < 0.0001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation