2015
DOI: 10.4321/s1135-57272015000300008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación y mejora de la calidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado en nueve hospitales del servicio murciano de salud

Abstract: The improvement achieved in the quality of informed consent documents is related to the effectiveness of corrective measures implemented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The education level of Chinese resident was relatively low, with 37.46% at or below the primary school level and 36.18% at the secondary school level [ 23 ], leading to the reading difficulties for the participants. Similarly, other studies found that ICFs from the United States, New Zealand, France, Spain, and Croatia failed to offer subjects complete information using clear and direct language [ 11 , 16 18 , 28 , 29 ]. 97% of Canadian ICFs used appropriate section headings to label the separate sections of content, and such headings were helpful for reading comprehension, and the results are just consistent with ours [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The education level of Chinese resident was relatively low, with 37.46% at or below the primary school level and 36.18% at the secondary school level [ 23 ], leading to the reading difficulties for the participants. Similarly, other studies found that ICFs from the United States, New Zealand, France, Spain, and Croatia failed to offer subjects complete information using clear and direct language [ 11 , 16 18 , 28 , 29 ]. 97% of Canadian ICFs used appropriate section headings to label the separate sections of content, and such headings were helpful for reading comprehension, and the results are just consistent with ours [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%