The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2014.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación económica de la utilización de hierro carboximaltosa en pacientes con deficiencia de hierro e insuficiencia cardiaca crónica en España

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the BI and cost-effectiveness of clinical interventions is an essential part of health technology assessment to support decision-making 31 . The Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) of FCM in the SNHS was previously analysed by Comin-Colet et al 21 , who found that FCM in patients with CHF and ID was a cost-effective option with a cost of e6,123.78 per QALY (quality-adjusted life-year), and below the recommended threshold of e25,000 per QALY in Spain 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of the BI and cost-effectiveness of clinical interventions is an essential part of health technology assessment to support decision-making 31 . The Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) of FCM in the SNHS was previously analysed by Comin-Colet et al 21 , who found that FCM in patients with CHF and ID was a cost-effective option with a cost of e6,123.78 per QALY (quality-adjusted life-year), and below the recommended threshold of e25,000 per QALY in Spain 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an economic perspective, a 2015 study assessed the cost-effectiveness (CE) of using FCM in Spain for CHF with ID and reduced LVEF 21 . However, there is no information for the Spanish public healthcare setting about the (BI) of such treatment, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo existen varios estudios de costo eficacia que demuestran que esta formulación es costo beneficiosa, considerando que se puede administrar mayor cantidad de hierro en cada administración, con un volumen de dilución menor que las otras presentaciones, y con menores efectos adversos de tipo de reacciones anafilácticas. (43) e) ¿Cómo se calcula la dosis de hierro y cómo se controla?…”
Section: C) ¿Cómo Hacemos Diagnóstico Del Déficit De Hierro?unclassified