2015
DOI: 10.24265/horizmed.2015.v15n1.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación de la técnica 2,2-Difenil-1-Picrilhidrazilo (DPPH) para determinar capacidad antioxidante

Abstract: Horiz Med 2015; 15 (1): Evaluación de la técnica 2,2-Difenil-1-Picrilhidrazilo (DPPH) para determinar capacidad antio idante 1 2 2 1 2 Químico Farmacéutico. RESUMENEste estudio evalúa la actividad antioxidante usando el método del radical libre 2,2-difenil-1-picrilhidracilo (DPPH). Este método se utiliza para determinar la capacidad antioxidante de alimentos y compuestos el valor anterior aumenta al incrementar la concentración de DPPH. El resultado obtenido en este estudio indica la importancia de la concentr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The antioxidant activity of the extracts (ECn1 and ECn2) and fractions were determined by radical scavenging capacity of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH • ) at 520 nm, and radical scavenging capacity ABTS •+ at 740 nm, both read on a FLUOStar Omega plate reader (BMG Labtech) Methanol was used as negative control, and Trolox as positive control, at concentrations of 0–10 mg L −1 ( Garzón et al., 2010 ; Giraldo Vásquez and Ramírez Aristizabal, 2013 ; Guija-Poma et al., 2015 ; Llivisaca et al., 2018 ; Nuengchamnong and Ingkaninan, 2017 ; Wootton-Beard et al., 2011 ). The DPPH • and ABTS •+ free radical scavenging activity were calculated as mean inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antioxidant activity of the extracts (ECn1 and ECn2) and fractions were determined by radical scavenging capacity of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH • ) at 520 nm, and radical scavenging capacity ABTS •+ at 740 nm, both read on a FLUOStar Omega plate reader (BMG Labtech) Methanol was used as negative control, and Trolox as positive control, at concentrations of 0–10 mg L −1 ( Garzón et al., 2010 ; Giraldo Vásquez and Ramírez Aristizabal, 2013 ; Guija-Poma et al., 2015 ; Llivisaca et al., 2018 ; Nuengchamnong and Ingkaninan, 2017 ; Wootton-Beard et al., 2011 ). The DPPH • and ABTS •+ free radical scavenging activity were calculated as mean inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free-radical scavenging activity of the grape juice samples and the polyphenol extracts was determined following the procedure described by Brand-Williams [ 48 ] with some modifications [ 49 ]. The oxidative compound DPPH was used as a substrate, and the IC 50 values were calculated by expressing the concentration (mg/L) of polyphenol (or extract) that scavenges the DPPH radical by 50%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another antioxidant assay is the DPPH which is based on the ability of compounds as hydrogen donors or free radical scavengers [50,51]. As ABTS assay, the antioxidant activity was significantly higher in hydrolysates filtered through a pore size of 30 kDa (970.06, 484.00 and 441.67 µg Trolox/g for 4, 6, and 8 h, respectively) except for a hydrolysis time of 10 h. Indeed, the antioxidant activity was not significantly different (p > 0.05) at 10 h of hydrolysis (400.82, 397.85, and 403.05 µg Trolox/g for 5, 10, and 30 kDa, respectively).…”
Section: Hydrolysis Timementioning
confidence: 99%