2014
DOI: 10.35663/amp.2014.313.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad del ácido hialurónico por vía oral asociado con glucosamina sulfato, condroitín sulfato y metilsulfonilmetano comparado con la asociación por vía oral de glucosamina sulfato, condroitín sulfato ymetilsulfonilmetano en la osteoartritis de rodilla

Abstract: Objetivo. Comparar la eficacia y la seguridad de la asociación de ácido hialurónico (AH), glucosamina sulfato (GS), condroitina sulfato (CS) y metilsulfonilmetano (MSM) versus GS, CS y MSM en el control de los síntomas de la osteoartritis (OA) de rodilla. Material y método. Estudio comparativo, aleatorizado prospectivo, a doble ciego, en pacientes con OA de rodilla, divididos en dos grupos, durante tres meses de tratamiento diario, vía oral. El grupo  1 recibió AH 120 mg + GS 1 500 mg + CS 1 200 mg + MSM 1 000… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a chondroprotective agent that reduces intra-articular friction and helps prevent delay cartilage degeneration by providing extra shock absorption (32,33). It has been attributed a potential role in meniscal healing (34)(35)(36)(37) and has shown anti-in ammatory and analgesic effects (38)(39)(40)(41)(42).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a chondroprotective agent that reduces intra-articular friction and helps prevent delay cartilage degeneration by providing extra shock absorption (32,33). It has been attributed a potential role in meniscal healing (34)(35)(36)(37) and has shown anti-in ammatory and analgesic effects (38)(39)(40)(41)(42).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%