2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2010.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación de la efectividad del colirio de suero autólogo en el tratamiento de patologías oculares

Abstract: The treatment with 100% autologous serum eye drops improved ocular symptoms for most patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, dilution may reduce the concentration of other beneficial factors at the same time, particularly EGF and fibronectin, which are proven to support proliferation and migration of corneal epithelial cells [14]. Although most published studies have reported the use of 20% autologous serum eye drops for treating a number of ocular surface conditions, some demonstrated good results in terms of both efficacy and safety at higher concentrations of 50–100% as well [6, 1517]. The undiluted autologous serum has previously been shown to be more effective than 20% serum in the epithelial healing process of mechanical corneal ulcers in animal study [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, dilution may reduce the concentration of other beneficial factors at the same time, particularly EGF and fibronectin, which are proven to support proliferation and migration of corneal epithelial cells [14]. Although most published studies have reported the use of 20% autologous serum eye drops for treating a number of ocular surface conditions, some demonstrated good results in terms of both efficacy and safety at higher concentrations of 50–100% as well [6, 1517]. The undiluted autologous serum has previously been shown to be more effective than 20% serum in the epithelial healing process of mechanical corneal ulcers in animal study [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the recent analyzed trials have tested the clinical results coming from SE treatment through the comparison with traditional therapeutic approaches such as artificial tears, antibiotics, or corticosteroids [ 79 , 91 , 92 ]. Several randomized studies suggest that SE treatment leads to an improved tear film stability and subjective comfort [ 29 , 69 , 83 , 88 , 91 , 93 , 94 ] by determining a faster epithelial healing time and a better corneal transparency without increase of vascularization or fibrosis. Moreover, several data have confirmed the safety and the almost absolute absence of toxic and side effects, especially in severe case of DES or in PED (except those related to an improper handling).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, several data have confirmed the safety and the almost absolute absence of toxic and side effects, especially in severe case of DES or in PED (except those related to an improper handling). A critical point of these published studies concerns the number of patients enrolled which are recurrently less than 100 [ 4 , 13 , 16 , 35 , 38 , 39 , 43 , 84 , 85 , 95 , 96 ] and the almost absence of long follow-up studies [ 69 ]. On the other hand, the evaluation of the ongoing studies on this therapy showed that the newer fields of clinical research are focusing on alternatives to SE like CBS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%