2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00296-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EUS-guided FNA of the left adrenal gland in patients with thoracic or GI malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
79
1
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
79
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from this study showing 92% sensitivity and 93% accuracy for PNB of hilar lesions are comparable to the sensitivity and accuracy rates of EUS-guided FNAB (92%-97%) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided FNAB (92%-98%). 22,[30][31][32][33][34] The reported complication rates associated with EUS-guided and endobronchial ultrasound-guided FNAB are very low overall, and complications relating to pneumothorax and thoracostomy tube placement have not been encountered for sampling of mediastinal and hilar lesions. 35,36 When endobronchial ultrasound-guided FNAB is used for sampling of peripheral lung lesions, the reported pneumothorax rate can be up to 8%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from this study showing 92% sensitivity and 93% accuracy for PNB of hilar lesions are comparable to the sensitivity and accuracy rates of EUS-guided FNAB (92%-97%) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided FNAB (92%-98%). 22,[30][31][32][33][34] The reported complication rates associated with EUS-guided and endobronchial ultrasound-guided FNAB are very low overall, and complications relating to pneumothorax and thoracostomy tube placement have not been encountered for sampling of mediastinal and hilar lesions. 35,36 When endobronchial ultrasound-guided FNAB is used for sampling of peripheral lung lesions, the reported pneumothorax rate can be up to 8%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3]21 A relatively new imaging modality that allows both detailed imaging as well as FNA of both adrenals (especially the left one) and neutralizes the above difficulties is endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-FNA. [133][134][135][136][137][138] It may even detect small lesions not visible on transabdominal imaging because of the proximity of the ultrasound transducer to the adrenal gland. As a result of this, organs that are usually traversed with a percutaneous approach are avoided.…”
Section: Fine-needle Aspiration (Fna) Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EUS has been shown to be superior to transabdominal US in visualising the left adrenal gland, with a detection rate of 98% as compared to 69% for transabdominal US 135 and an accuracy of about 83%. 138 EUS-FNA biopsy is considered to be safe and major complications after EUS-FNA biopsy of deep-seated lesions are rare. Most of the adverse events observed are similar to those associated with endoscopy.…”
Section: Fine-needle Aspiration (Fna) Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) overcomes these limitations due to proximity to target structures (adrenals), is safe and easy to perform in the experienced hands and has good diagnostic accuracy. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In this paper, we report ten cases of adrenal histoplasmosis diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%