2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00363-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
122
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
122
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the main imaging modalities employed to detect IPMN (computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)), EUS offers the highest resolution [3] and enables a cytologic diagnosis of IPMN via fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). However, the sensitivity of EUS-FNA cytology diagnosis is low (44-75%) [4,5] and the technique suffers from a steep learning curve and high inter-operator variability [6]. Thus, the effectiveness of identifying cancer precursor lesions such as IPMN could be improved by developing a more sensitive and quantitative detection method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the main imaging modalities employed to detect IPMN (computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)), EUS offers the highest resolution [3] and enables a cytologic diagnosis of IPMN via fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). However, the sensitivity of EUS-FNA cytology diagnosis is low (44-75%) [4,5] and the technique suffers from a steep learning curve and high inter-operator variability [6]. Thus, the effectiveness of identifying cancer precursor lesions such as IPMN could be improved by developing a more sensitive and quantitative detection method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in surgical procedures how fast trainees achieve the ability to get surgery adequately performed without complications [42,43] . Also in endoscopy some reports use colonoscopy models [44] and endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration [45] with similar methodology. A single report exists on the learning curve for the diagnostic performance of endoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summarizing the results of 23 studies including 1,096 patients over a 21-year period, the sensitivity of EUS for the detection of a pancreatic mass was in the range of 85-100%. (Al-Haddad & Eloubeidi, 2010;Yasuda et al, 1988;DeWitt et al, 2004;Chhieng et al, 2002;Eloubeidi & Tamhane, 2005) The operating characteristics of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic masses in 547 patients were: sensitivity 95%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 98% and negative predictive value 80%, with and overall accuracy of 94.1%. (Eloubeidi et al, 2007) Such accuracy numbers allow for preoperative counseling of patients, minimizing surgeon's operative time in cases of unresectable disease, and avoiding surgical biopsies in those with inoperable disease, also allowing for conservative management of patients with benign pathology results.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%