2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EUS-guided FNA of centrally located lung tumours following a non-diagnostic bronchoscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(17 reference statements)
4
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of EUS was 96.7% when only the visualised masses were considered, but this value dropped to 80.8% when the 11 nonvisualised masses were also taken into account. ANNEMA et al [64] conducted a prospective study with 32 patients to assess the feasibility and diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of centrally located lung tumours following a nondiagnostic bronchoscopy. EUS-FNA provided a diagnosis of malignancy in 97% of patients.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensitivity of EUS was 96.7% when only the visualised masses were considered, but this value dropped to 80.8% when the 11 nonvisualised masses were also taken into account. ANNEMA et al [64] conducted a prospective study with 32 patients to assess the feasibility and diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of centrally located lung tumours following a nondiagnostic bronchoscopy. EUS-FNA provided a diagnosis of malignancy in 97% of patients.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 39% of the patients, EUS-FNA not only established the diagnosis of lung cancer, but also staged patients as having T4 disease, based on tumour invasion; however, the latter was not verified surgically. None of the included patients had mediastinal lymph node involvement at CT scan [64]. VARADARAJULU et al [50] conducted a retrospective study including 18 patients who had undergone EUS-FNA of a lung mass abutting the oesophageal wall.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a prospective study of 32 patients with suspected lung cancer and a primary tumor located adjacent to the esophagus, intrapulmonary masses were detected in all patients, and the diagnosis of lung cancer was established in 97% of patients. 6 In another small retrospective study, EUS identified and diagnosed all periesophageal pulmonary masses. 7 Once the primary tumor has been identified, EUS can help to define mediastinal invasion, which includes involvement of mediastinal structures such as left atrium, large central vessels, esophagus, and vertebrae by the intrapulmonary tumor.…”
Section: Role In Primary Tumor (T) Evaluation and Mediastinal Invasiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EUS-FNA might also be used in some cases for staging of distant metastasis (M1), as in the presence of suspected metastases to the left lobe of the liver and/or to the left adrenal gland (15). Further indications to EUS-FNA are represented by the presence of pulmonary lesions adjacent to the esophagus (8,(16)(17)(18). More difficult is the diagnosis with EUS-FNA of mediastinal lymphoproliferative processes, because of the frequent need in these cases for histological samples obtained by extensive surgical techniques (19).…”
Section: Indications and Contraindicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, the diagnostic yield for EUS-FNA was 100%, in the absence of complications. The following year, a prospective study was published (17), which included patients with suspected lung cancer adjacent to or near the esophagus (less than 1 cm) already subject to a non-diagnostic bronchoscopy, none of the patients having mediastinal nodal enlargement at the CT scan of the chest. The rationale behind the work was the high percentage of failures diagnostic bronchoscopy in central pulmonary neoplasms (30%) (34), associated with invasiveness and the risk of complications of alternative methods used in these cases, as CT-guided biopsy with pneumothorax in 25-45% of cases (35,36).…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Mediastinal or Intrapulmonary Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%